SOUNDTRACK: AZTEC CAMERA-“Jump” (1984).
This is a wonderfully twisted covered of Van Halen’s “Jump.” VH’s version of “Jump” is bouncy, lively, fun, it makes you want to yes, Jump! It was many years after the release of VH’s “Jump” that I heard the Aztec Camera version (even though it was released the same year). The first time I heard it I assumed it was a joke.
I didn’t know much about Aztec Camera (and actually still don’t–looking at their Wikipedia page I don’t recognize the names of any of their singles). But I have grown to love this cover of “Jump.” In fact I prefer it to the original.
The opening chord structure makes me think it’s going to be the Rolling Stone’s “Waiting on a Friend” but instead of Jagger’s ooh oohs we get Roddy Frame’s deep voice practically whispering the lyrics that David Lee Roth made famous. And it stays with this delightfully mellow acoustic style and pacing throughout. The guitar work in the bridge is actually much more interesting than the bridge in the Van Halen version (ouch).
The chorus seems kind of odd with his very mellowly saying “jump” (although David Lee Roth doesn’t scream “jump” either, it’s the backing vocals that do the exciting part). I feel like the original VH version hasn’t held up that well, but the Aztec Camera version shows that it’s quite a good song.
Check it out here.
[READ: Week of November 8] Consider David Foster Wallace [first three essays]
I lied.
I said that I wouldn’t feel up to writing posts about all of the articles in this book on a regular basis. As it turns out, I don’t have a lot to say about these essays, but I had a few thoughts about each one. Since there’s a group reading going on, I thought it might be fun to post these thoughts now while people were still speaking about the articles instead of waiting until the end.
Before I say anything about this articles, I want to preface that I’m not going to repeat things that were said in the group read (for a couple of reasons). Everything here is going to be things that I felt about the article and maybe, if something another reader says really sticks with me, I’ll mention it as an influence on me.
Having said that, in one of the comments, author Clare Hayes-Brady says that her article is a part of a longer thesis. I found this to be a very useful thing to know, and I assume that she is not the only one who had to compress her article because of size and time constraints. With that in mind, I’m going to accept that if it seems like the author could/should say more about a certain thing within the article that there is probably a larger version of the piece.
And finally, because I don’t have a lot to say about the pieces, I’m only going to mention things that I found puzzling/confusing. But be assured that if I don’t mention the vast majority of the article it’s because I found it interesting/compelling/believable. I don’t feel comfortable paraphrasing the articles’ argument. Besides, what would be the point of that?











SOUNDTRACK: BROKEN BELLS-Broken Bells (2010).

