SOUNDTRACK: THE VIOLET ARCHERS-Victoria, BC, October 2005 (2005).
T
his live bootleg comes from the Rheostatics Live website. If The Violet Archers were to become a huge internationally famous band (which, let’s face it, they’re not), this would be an awesome bootleg to have. It’s from a show before their first album was released, and, if the stage banter is to be believed, before they’d even thought of a name for the band. (There’s a joke that they wanted to call themselves The Gay Apparel, which is awesome).
Indeed, I assume that this show was recorded in 2004, not 2005 as listed online.
So, this show seems like it’s recorded in front of about 20 people. The recording quality isn’t ideal (the drums sound pretty dreadful) but it conveys the spirit of the show very well.
The first two songs are just Tim and his acoustic guitar (“Simple” sounds great in this context although “All the Good” works better as a band number). Then the band comes on. Ida Nilsen is not with them yet, but the band sounds great together and the songs are fully formed (the album is said to be coming out in the next spring).
It’s a great show and Tim Vesely sounds a lot more like he did with the Rheostatics than he does on the regular album. I guess the live setting brings out the old voice from Tim. And I would be remiss if I didn’t mention the guitarist with the great name: Yawd Sylvester. Outstanding!
[READ: September 28, 2010] “Imperial Bedroom”
This piece is about privacy. It was written 12 years ago, when the fear of the loss of privacy was in its infancy. And Franzen makes a very convincing case that we were (and I assume still are) overreacting in a big way to fears of privacy loss.
He opens by noting that the panic about privacy is all the rage, excepted that the public doesn’t seem to be genuinely alarmed. He sets his argument on the backdrop of the Clinton/Lewisnky Starr Report. And what he bemoans is that this most private of information is coming out of the most public of offices (and the most imperial of bedrooms). [With the valid corollary–who is ever going to run for office if this kind of shit is going to be made public on such a grand scale?]
He gives us a basic history if the “right to privacy” which he says legally is a tough concept. Because whatever you call the various forms of invasion of privacy, legally they often fall into other areas–trespass, defamation or theft. What’s left is emotional distress, which is always a nebulous concept. (more…)








Episode 15 is a huge one, so I finished up that and 16 this week.






