SOUNDTRACK: NEUTRAL MILK HOTEL-In the Aeroplane Over the Sea (1998).
I had always put off getting into Neutral Milk Hotel. They were just another one of those Elephant 6 bands, and there were so many bands and splinter-bands and solo bands that I had to draw the line somewhere. And Neutral Milk Hotel were on the other side of it. I hadn’t even heard them, I just decided I couldn’t listen to them.
About four months ago, I heard a piece on NPR about a high school putting on a musical based on this album. They played bits and pieces of the disc and I was totally blown away. The play is somehow connected to the Anne Frank story (as the album apparently is, too, although I haven’t been able to figure that out from the lyrics at all).
It also turns out that my friend Jarrett had put “Two-Headed Boy” on a sampler disc for me, so I already DID know some of the disc.
Make no mistake, this is an unusual disc: from the bizarre cover, to the bizarre song titles (“The King of Carrot Flowers”). And, most notably, to the instrumentation. Sure it starts out simply enough with some acoustic guitars, but it eventually adds everything from flugelhorn (a recent safe word on How I Met Your Mother)to euphonium to zanzithophone(!) to what I thought was a theremin, but which turns out to be a singing saw (even cooler!).
“The King of Carrot Flowers Pts 2 – 3” begins with the very earnest “I love you, Jesus Christ.” It eventually morphs into the rollicking Pt 3, with the repeated effort of “I would [x] until I learn to [x]” It’s frankly an amazing trilogy to open the disc.
The title track and “Two-Headed Boy” continue this fascinating orchestral folk with incredible catchiness and what can only be described as supremely earnest singing. At times, the singing almost makes one uncomfortable for how naked it sounds.
“The Fool” allows for some interesting marching band type instrumentation, but it is followed by even more earnest singing in “Holland, 1945” a ramshackle song that feels like it is trying to race itself to the end. And then there’s “Oh Comely” a simple guitar ballad that grows and shrinks for 8 minutes of raw, lyric bending. Eventually it adds some horns as Magnum sings “we know who our enemies arrrrrrrrrre.”
The whole disc has a sound of being recorded too close to the microphone…with many many sounds crackling into distortion. And while it does have a feeling of cheapness, it really has more of a feeling of urgency…they couldn’t wait to get these songs out, and damn the recording levels (the guitars on “Ghost” are almost outrageously too loud, even though they are not louder than anything else in the song).
The disc ends with the fun, keyboard and uilleann pipe fueled “The Penny Arcade in Calirfornia” a wonderful instrumental that reprises some of the musical lines from other songs. And then comes “Two Headed Boy, Pt 2” which doesn’t really reprise the original song. Rather, it is a multi-versed song in which Magnum barely pauses for breath trying to get the lengthy verses (with no evident chorus) out. It ends with an actual reprise of “Two Headed Boy” and fades out.
It’s a fantastic disc. Simply fantastic.
Neutral Milk Hotel has basically been on hiatus since this record, so it’s not hard to catch up with their output (2 full lengths and an EP). It’s just a shame if you waited as long as I did to do it.
[READ: September 18, 2009] “Hail the Returning Dragon, Clothed in New Fire”
When Infinite Jest came out there was a lot of discussion of its being “ironic.” But generally, it is well established at this point (just look at virtually any post on Infinite Summer) about how un-ironic the book is. In fact, it rather eschews irony. (I’m not going to detail why, I promise).
This essay, if nothing else, should hammer home the idea that DFW had very little tolerance for irony (even despite the nature of this book, the magazine it comes from, and some of the other ironic pieces in it).
The piece basically uses dragons as a metaphor for AIDS, which sounds frivolous but truly isn’t. The idea put forth is that restrictions on sexuality make sex a more substantial experience. Thus, knights needed to fight dragons in order to win their maidens. If they charged across the country, lances bared and ready for action, to get to a maiden spread-eagled and waiting, well, it might be somewhat anticlimactic. And AIDS (circa 1996) is like the new challenge that has encouraged sexual partners to be more creative to prove their love to each other.
During the 60s, free love reigned and taboos were struck down left and right, and yet that led to the sexual malaise of the 70s, with wife swapping and other questionable practices. The rise of AIDS has made sex meaningful again, or at least something you won’t simply indulge in because it’s free (or cheap).
Its weird to see DFW talk so openly about sex especially since almost no one has sex in IJ (except Orin, but that’s something else entirely), and it is referred to pretty much only as Xing. But, indeed, he has quite a point here. I don’t know if it was the time the article was written or if it’s the nature of DFW himself, but the earnestness of this article was quite refreshing.
This has also made me want to re-read this rest of the essays in the book. I bought it when it came out since I was such a fan of Might Magazine. I’m quite certain I read them all then, but it has been quite some time, so it will be interesting to see them with a new perspective.

You are proving to be unrelentingly interesting, Paul. Thanks for the tip to the DFW piece, a nice coda, as you say, on earnestness as applied to sexuality, the latter being not especially romaticized in IJ. Of course, (that being 1998), we would want to talk about “AIDS-the-cultural-moment” having to do with bourgeois sexuality in an age of the cocktail-cure and “AIDS-the disease-that-kills-poor-people-and-non-white-people.”
But while we’re talking about the first, you should also read Mark Grief’s “Afternoon of the Sex Children,” first published in N+1 Issue 4, excerpted in Harper’s 2007, then reprinted in the DFW edited “The Best American Essays 2007”. It’s on the Harper’s website, or I can email it to you.
Grief describes the overvaluation of sex in an age of liberalization (as opposed to “liberation”, which was the self-proclaimed aim of the sexual revolution), and the consequence of an inability to be properly indifferent to sex. Some similar themes can be found in the work of Michel Houellebecq (in Whatever, Elementary Particles).
Grief is a bit more cynical than Wallace, here, but they’re not worlds apart, either.
The fact that this was written 13 or so years ago made it slightly difficult to discuss w/r/t AIDS. I mean, so much has happened in those 13 years that I’m not even sure I could really do it justice if I were to try and critique it culturally.
This book (and I’ve been reading more of it) is fascinating to read so long after it was written.
I’m going to interlibrary loan the Essays book. Although I do have a subscription to Harpers, so maybe I’ll locate the excerpt first. It’s funny you should mention that piece since DFW does talk about it in the introduction to that anthology.
Oh, and the opening sentence of your comment was very flattering. Thank you.
[…] DAVID FOSTER WALLACE-”Hail the Returning Dragon, Clothed in New Fire” Dragon slaying as a metaphor for AIDS (full review here). […]